Jax is off job hunting, and I declined because I need to do some tidying up. Namely in my bedroom.
I would rather be outside, it looks gorgeous.
*sigh*
Before I go and clean, read this and then read the blog that spawned this response:
Your path of thought is honourable albeit flawed in its brash allegations.
To find Toronto publications accountable for supporting the sex trade of runaways and broken women is quite the accusation.
Publications sell advertising.
Advertising supports the paper.
It is an unreasonable expectation to place upon the publications to ask them to research and to try to identify the missing children apparently lured into the sextrade.
That is not their mandate, their mandate is to exist, to report and to survive. For the publications to research their advertisers to find unwilling sextrade workers would be to admit that they are advertising prostitutes.
Which sir is illegal.
Hands are tied from the need for revenue, and the necessity to look the other way.
I am indifferent to the advertising of sextrade workers. They have existed since the dawn of time. But, obviously you are not. No doubt, right now you are engaged in an passionate search to reunite mother’s with their wayward daughters.
If you are not, then I count you as a hypocrite and will disregard your meandering blog as nothing more than righteous spewings from an armchair activist.
Comment by karmacake — January 11, 2007
Karmacake is back, and she's taking no prisoners!